A group of thirty mothers were seeking shelter in a maternity hospital in El Fasher, Sudan, when the massacre started. Several had recently given birth, while others were in the midst of labor.
Working that night, a 28-year-old lab technician, a technician named Abdo-Rabo Ahmed, became one of the few known survivors. “The sounds of screaming reached me of women and children,” he states. “They were killing everyone inside the hospital. Survival meant running for your life.”
This horrifying event stands as among the worst examples in the two-year civil war tearing the African nation apart. Armed soldiers forced their way into the building, leaving dead more than 460 innocent people inside.
Rights organizations have labeled it “an act of unspeakable brutality,” and a stark illustration of the collapse in safety for civilians living amidst warfare in multiple global hotspots.
While all major powers are signatories to the international laws of war, which commit them to defending civilians, the past year has seen a record number of violence targeting health services. Expectant mothers are particularly at risk due to their reliance on locally available medical care.
Research and compiled data show an shocking trend: nearly 300 violent acts against maternity care facilities, staff, and pregnant women over the last three years, including at least 119 direct strikes on hospitals and delivery wards.
“These incidents do not represent inevitable outcomes of conflict. They constitute a deliberate strategy of violence against reproduction.”
The majority of these incidents have happened in Ukraine, Gaza, and Sudan, where countless of women bearing children are confined.
Mothers have lost their lives, denied medical attention, or made to have their babies in deplorable situations. The data also indicates that at least 68 midwives, obstetricians, and gynaecologists have been murdered, 15 abducted, and 101 taken into custody—sometimes in the act of delivering babies.
Statistics are thought to be a significant underestimate, as they are limited to incidents documented publicly. In many areas of fighting, information is scarce.
Last year, analysis showed that one in two mothers who perished while pregnant or giving birth resided in a war zone. This underscores a devastating pattern.
Apart from fatalities, these attacks are wrecking hospitals and wards, posing a long-term threat to demographic stability.
In Gaza, the devastating effect on reproductive health rights has been cited by a UN commission as part of the basis for genocide allegations.
Following truces, doctors report that women and children are still perishing from medical shortages, owing to severe deficits of medicine and equipment. Agencies have reported women having children by the roadside because hospitals were out of reach.
“Direct shelling fired at the wards, operating rooms, and maternity wards,” says the head of a major hospital’s gynecology department. A military spokesperson has contested deliberately targeting maternity care or aiming to influence birthrates.
Since early 2022, at least 80 hospitals for mothers and babies have been damaged or destroyed in Ukraine. Reports from frontline hospitals describe births forced underground and extreme psychological pressure leading to maternal health issues.
“Russia is targeting us deliberately,” says the head of obstetrics at a repeatedly damaged hospital in Kherson. Russian authorities have denied deliberately targeting civilians.
“The reality is, every facility faces the threat of assault,” comments a medical director in Sumy. “Even if air defence intercepts a drone, the falling debris may hit a hospital.”
For the hundreds of millions of women living within range of fighting, there are scarce guarantees and even fewer war crimes prosecutions for those assaulting reproductive health.
This absence of consequences has fostered a “environment where anything goes,” argues a human rights lawyer. “Assaults against maternal services, like forced pregnancy or forced sterilisation, may constitute acts of genocide by destroying a group's future.”
In El Fasher, the area lacked access to humanitarian aid long before the hospital attack, with malnutrition increasing drastically, especially among children and pregnant women.
In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, information is scarce because of a lack of access from rebel-held areas. Nevertheless, shelling in Goma damaged a maternity hospital, resulting in tragic loss of life.
In Myanmar, medical facilities have been bombed and dozens of midwives and patients have been arrested, killed, or injured over the past two years of civil war.
The majority of childbirth fatalities are avoidable with standard medicine, but war collapses medical infrastructure. Rights groups note that fear is now driving women away from facilities once considered safe, leading them to risky home births devoid of emergency care.
“When childbirth centers become intentional targets speaks to a broader and more sinister pattern: the use of violence against hospitals as a weapon to spread fear and to destroy community bonds,” notes a legal researcher.
“Hospitals are not completely safe for hospitals in war. Under the Geneva conventions, medical facilities are not inviolable if used for acts deemed ‘prejudicial to the opposing side’, which has now become a standard defence.”
Elena Hartwell is a tech enthusiast and lifestyle writer exploring the intersection of innovation and well-being.